In February, Rupert Lowe announced that his Restore Britain pressure group would officially become a political party. Within weeks it claimed to have over 100,000 registered members. It has one MP, no local associations and a platform designed to appeal almost exclusively to those who think Nigel Farage has lost his edge. What it does have is a large and energetic social media following, which in 2026 could be all a political party needs.
Labor spent much of February consumed by a procedural dispute over whether Andy Burnham could run in a by-election. The answer depended on the views of the party’s National Executive Committee, a body made up of various representatives from trade unions, constituency parties and socialist societies. In the end, that machine started and Burnham was destroyed by it.
Both Labor and Restore Britain are, in the parlance of British democracy, political parties. It is not clear that they have anything else in common.
Political competition in Britain has always been shaped by the society that sits beneath it. The post-war system that came to define modern British politics reflected this with unusual clarity. Labor was created to represent the industrial working class and the Conservatives came to represent everyone else. This sharp class division produced a distinctive set of political institutions – mass memberships, local associations, seaside party conferences, stable electoral coalitions – that defined what a political party should look like.
Subscribe to the New Statesman today and save 75%
And for decades this form of political competition worked. In the 1950s, the Conservative Party alone had nearly three million members. Constituency associations were serious local institutions, embedded in the social structure of the communities they represented. To join a political party was not an act of consumer choice, but an expression of identity, a statement of who you were, where you came from and which side of the basic dividing line of British life you stood on. The party structure reflected the class structure. Each reinforced the other.
Over time, these foundations weakened. Britain’s post-war industrial economy declined, class identities loosened and new fault lines – immigration, nationalism, education – began to run across rather than across the old dividing lines.
In the 2024 election, for the first time in its history, Labor performed better with managers than manual workers. The class system that underpinned British politics is gone, replaced not by a new alignment but something more like an absence, a fragmented, unstable social order that no longer provides stable foundations for political life. The old parties have failed to respond, weighed down by the very institutions that once made them formidable. This is the “zombie age”: an old political order is collapsing, its shell still in place.
Labor is in many ways more exposed to this new order, an organization created explicitly for a world that no longer exists. The trade union bloc votes, the Electoral Labor Parties, the painstaking internal machinery were all built to represent an industrial working class that barely exists and certainly no longer votes Labour. But the conservatives’ supposed flexibility has hardly helped them, as they have drifted between electoral coalitions for more than a decade.
Against these rulers, a new type of political organization has emerged. As with most 21str British politics of the century, Nigel Farage is its pioneer. Over the past decade it has morphed from one shell of a political party to another, finally perfecting the form with Reform in the UK: a party originally created as a veritable corporation, run by one man and built almost entirely around a single issue. The social roots of the reform are, at present, limited to a branded pub.
The Greens have arrived at a similar destination by another route. Zack Polanski has hijacked a legacy institution and repurposed it, moving the Greens away from their core environmentalism to fill the void left by the Corbyn-era Labor Party. Farage and Polanski share a method, not an ideology: both understood how social media had lowered the barriers to political organizing, making it possible to build a mass following without anything in the way of organizational infrastructure.
Both have amassed large memberships. But what does party membership mean in 2026? Not much more than paying a few pounds and sharing something on TikTok. British politics has become a landscape of pop-up parties, each representing an increasingly narrow slice of the electorate.
Social media may have lowered the barriers to political organizing, but AI is removing them entirely. Until recently, even the most bare-bones political campaigns still needed a human infrastructure—people to draft policy, manage communications, run a campaign. This restriction is disappearing. An AI model can read a government data release, draft a response and circulate a press release before a legacy party schedules a meeting to discuss.
Some activists are already going further, using AI-generated “synthetic” audiences to test messages and model public opinion. A fake room full of ‘Stevenage Women’ can be created in seconds. The machinery of a political party is becoming something that one person can run from the kitchen table.
This is a description of what has already begun to happen, not some kind of wild futurism. The barriers that once made it so difficult to build a political party – money, expertise, pure human bodies – are falling. Soon we will live in a world where a single person can run a political campaign with nothing more than a social media account and an AI subscription.
The zombie age of British politics won’t last forever. But what follows is not a return to the stable, socially rooted party system of the post-war period. The same technology that allowed Farage to build a massive party from almost nothing continues to accelerate. Barriers to political organization are still falling.
The result is a politics of permanent fragmentation, where parties form and break up around issues, personalities and viral moments, not a passing phase. It is the direction of travel and there is no apparent force that can change it.
Content from our partners
